Master Steve: Formulas

Table 1 - List of "strengths"

List your strengths in the table below.

You can ask your friends to comment on your strengths.

Shared by `Steve Moghadam` on May 10, 2025

Table 8 - The relation of `strengths` and `weaknesses` to `achievement barriers` to `goals/purposes` including title

In this step, you are to make your “strengths” and “weaknesses” relevant to “achievement barriers” to each “goal/purpose”.

Ask yourself:

Which of your “strengths” contribute to solving “achievement barriers”?

Which of your “weaknesses” is a “barrier” to achieving “goals/purpose” or intensifying one of “achievement barriers"?

Shared by `N**********i` on Mar 27, 2025

View Share

Table 18 - Number of frequencies of `current possibilities` for implementing `solutions to achievement barriers` based on `time of achievement` to `goals/ purposes`

Step 18: Scoring “Weaknesses” Now each of “weaknesses” should be scored based on the changes. You should score out of 1 to 100 to each “weakness” based on solvability, regardless of every other factor. This score means how much you fail changeability of your “weaknesses”. For example if being a controller is a part of your “weaknesses” then how much you feel you’re are able to change your “weakness”? This score relates to many personal factors; how flexible, changeable or malleable you are, or how long that “weakness” is with you, all of which affect on the sore you to malleability or solvability of a “weakness”. After scoring to all “weaknesses”, sort them according to table 15 from the most frequent ones to the lowest respectively. Finally provide table 19 like the below example.

Shared by `N**********i` on Mar 27, 2025

View Share

Table 16 - Number of frequencies of `Achievement Barriers` based on `time of achievement` to `goals/purposes`

Step 16: Specifying All Frequencies of “Solutions to Achievement Barriers” of “Goals/Purposes” Ordered by “Time of Achievement” The next analysis is extracted from the list of “solutions to achievement barriers” (table 12). Frequencies of each solution through overall analysis, up to this point, should be written. Through three short term periods of time (under 1 year), midterm (1 to 3 years) and long term (3 to 5 years or more) and as per the highest frequency to the lowest should be ordered. For example, time management is a solution that occurred five times in short term “goals/purposes’ and four times in midterm “goals/purposes”. Or studying has been mentioned as one of the solutions of short term “goals/purposes” four times and another two times in midterm “goals/purposes” and once in long term “goals/ purposes”

Shared by `N**********i` on Mar 27, 2025

View Share

Table 21 - The Changeability Score and removing `weaknesses` ordered by the highest to lowest frequency

Step 21: Comparing Modification Time of “Weaknesses” with “Goals/ Purposes” “Time of Achievement” and Categorizing by Traffic Lights Colors In this step, we will analyze table 22. By first looking at the column 3 of table 21 (21- 3), you will be able to see the highest frequency of weakness has occurred in certain period. You can then compare all columns 3 of table 22 (22-3) and column 3 of table 21 (21-3). See whether the “weakness” is related to a “goal/purpose”. Also make effort to ensure the problem/barrier is solvable within a particular time chosen to achieve the “goal/purpose” ¾ Definitely Solvable “Weakness” with High Score If the related “weakness” to a “goals/purpose” is solvable within “time of achievement” to get that “goals/purpose”, then you should score it over 50 and specify it with green color of traffic light. For example, since being hasty in table 21 has the highest frequency among long-term goals (21-3- 5(2)) and in table 21 the needed time for modification is 10 months. (22-3-2) so, cell 22-1-2 should be specified with green color. In table 12 as there are many versions of it for all individual “goals/purposes” and “achievement barriers” so through all pages wherever we see “weakness” of being hasty it should be green. ¾ Lower Scored “Weaknesses” If the “weakness” related to a “goals/purpose” is not solvable within “time of achievement” you have considered to that “goals/purpose”, but is still scored over and does approach 50 but is not solvable easily. These “weaknesses” should be specified with yellow color of traffic lights. For example, “Weakness” of being distracted in table 21 has the highest frequency among short-term goals (under 1 year) (21-3-3(1)) and in table 22 the required time for modifying it is 18 months (22-3-1) so, cell 22-1-1 is specified with yellow. Again refer back to table 12 and wherever you see distracted “weakness”, it should be specified with yellow color. In other words, yellow “weaknesses” are “weaknesses” which are time taking and the needed time for resolving them doesn’t adapt the required time for achieving relevant “goals/purposes, but their solvability score does approach 50.

Shared by `S***********i` on Mar 27, 2025

View Share

Table 23 - Coloring `weaknesses` based on solvability within the time of achieving to relevant `goals/purposes`